Items (0)
£0.00(£0.00 ex VAT outside EU)

Stockings and the march of time

(Edited from contributions to the Stockings HQ discussion forum)

- There was a good article in the Sunday Times at the weekend on the return of ’50s fashion, complete with pictures of lots of ladies, including celebrities, ranging from Diana Dors to Queen Elizabeth II wearing those beautiful flowing dresses that were so typical of the period. Guys then didn’t know how lucky they were – tights hadn’t even been invented and good girls never wore trousers (indeed even bad girls were seldom allowed to do so).

If we really are to see a revival of these fashions I for one would be delighted and it would not come a moment too soon. By contrast I was watching some “celebrities” of the modern era on the box the other day and it made for grim viewing. On the London regional news programme a female journalist (don’t know her name) was doing a piece on lunchtime drinking. At the end of the report, she was shown sitting in a bar dressed in a pair of jeans. OK wear trousers if you must but I rather object to a supposedly serious TV journalist appearing on my TV screen in apparel that would get her sent home from most offices.

Then there was the BBC Holiday Programme where Claudia Winkelman appeared wearing jeans and T-shirt with a jumper round her waist. Lovely looking girl Claudia, but again is it really appropriate to appear on a serious TV programme looking like you’ve just emerged from the playground?

As if that wasn’t enough I watched about two minutes of a Steps concert, which was definitely two minutes too long. Aside from the bloody awful music the three girls in that band have to be about the most unsexy, un-feminine dressers conceivable… I swear that they were all wearing exotic coloured pyjamas!

I wouldn’t swap the lives we lead today for ’50s austerity for anything, but in sartorial terms we have definitely lost something along the way.

- An interesting observation and wish you have made. You stated: “I wouldn’t swap the lives we lead today for ’50s austerity for anything… ” but let’s look at what we have given or gained in the ensuing years:

The two-way respect for the genders has been lost; woman wear pantyhose “because they are convenient”. Kids are given birth to rather than raised. To dress to appeal is considered old-fashioned. Both people work more and see each other less in a relationship. The more we make the more we spend and then some. Stockings are actually more economical and logical (you don’t throw out a whole pair if you get a run). Many products we bought in the ’40s and ’50s (if we didn’t throw them out for being too old-fashioned) are still usable today – whereas something from last Christmas is probably already broken.

People dressed up to go to Church, dinner (even at home), the theatre or just over to a friend’s house. I am not one to want to go back to a world where woman or minorities were oppressed but it seems we have thrown out the baby with the bath water.

- Sadly, women will never return to the beautiful fifties fashions and the flowing dresses and skirts, nor accompanying high heels and fully-fashioned stockings.

Never again will we see the glamour and sophistication of the likes of Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly with their stunning natural looks looking so glamorous.

So instead we will sadly have to put up with the likes of Tara Palmer Tomkinson, Lady Victoria Hervey, Catherine Zeta Jones, Liz Hurley, anyone who has dealings with the Gallaghers, silly girl bands, All Saints, Atomic Kitten etc who mime and dress in khaki, Britney Spears in stuff rejected from Oxfam, and stupid Helen from Big Brother who has become a celebrity with no talent whatsoever but that shows you how stupid a nation in the UK we have become;

My list continues with Victoria Beckham, Geri Halliwell, Jordan who looks like she is about to explode, have to pass on your choice of Claudia Winkleman, most certainly Anna Ryder Richardson though and many British soap stars.

So you are going to ask me at the end of the day who I would class as current day glamour?

Most certainly Penelope Cruz, Catherine Denevue, and there I am afraid my choice although limited ends at present…

But I can name you many more from the ’50s and I am only 38, so if you can find a role model of female sophistication here in the millennium, who is natural and not abusive to the eye, I await your choices!

- I long for the ’50s. If there was any period I could be hermetically sealed in it would be the time between 1946 and 1962, possibly stretched to 1966. Something happened in 1967 (not uncoincidentally the “summer of love” and the rise of hippiedom and the massive “counterculture”). It was the start of a downhill trend, almost as if a cannon had been fired straight at the heart of civility, fashion, style, glamour, manners and “adulthood”.

Take a look at any movie made up to about the mid-1960s, and contrast that with films in the aftermath. Pre-1967 adult culture ruled. People dressed-up, homes and apartments had “adult” looks, people knew social graces and etiquette. Since then the world has descended into a form of adolescence (who are today’s role models? Homer Simpson, Ted Bundy), uncivility (witness rise in crime), family decay (I believe there should be alternatives to nuclear family nevertheless look at the ills (welfare mothers, fatherless homes, massive divorce rates, abandoned children) wrought in its aftermath).

We may have a more wonderful technological civilisation. Our health care may be better. And there is generally, I believe, a greater sense of egalitarianism. For these reasons the world is better today. But we have lost so many of the forms of “adult civility. ” Included in this of course is fashion and style. I look back with envy at the WW II generation who came of age in that incredible post-war period, with glamorous stylish women. And because women’s clothes were so wonderful then and femininity as a value so prized, even women who may have been less physically glamorous were exceedingly charming and alluring. Both women – and men (and I include myself) – today vastly pale by comparison.

- I agree with all of your thoughts – that somewhere, somehow, we’ve lost a sense of classiness and formality that I think makes life somewhat more bearable.

Thank you for adding a dose of reality to this. Life for women and minorities was not as good as we’d like to think. The strides toward fairness for all have been a positive thing. Since none of us lived through it the first time, we can’t know what it was REALLY like.

All we can do is try to recreate a little of that among ourselves, and among our circle of friends. The friends my husband and I have understand this, and respect those old traditions.

- One piece of solace is the ad I saw the other day for the stage production of Peggy Sue Got Married, starring the lovely Ruthie Henshall. She is pictured in one of those flowing dresses and wearing a nice pair of slingbacks. Ms. Henshall’s nylon credentials are impeccable as she also starred in the London production of Chicago

Posted in Stockings HQ - Stockings Culture

3 Comments on Stockings and the march of time

  1. David – I agree, we live in a drab era, where convenience and so-called comfort take preceedence over better things. But we need not compromise, even if it makes us seem a little eccentric. We can chose to restict our wardrobe to tailored skirts and dresses (Hobbs for me!),,We can commit to never appearing in public without good quality hoseiry, to make hats and gloves a trademark, and to act with ladylike deportment as best as one can. People soon get used to you, and it makes you feel GREAT

    best wisges

    Ann Ryan | April 7, 2012 at 9:09 pm () ()
  2. Couldn’t agree more david , I too yearn for that era and am saddened by the masculisation of the modern woman .I am lucky enough to be married to a woman who wears stockings( sadly not every day though) when she wears a skirt or a dress.I feel sorry for the young men of today who sadly will never see their wife or gf clad in a lovely pair of nylon or silk stockings .
    Hopefully both feminity and stockings will see their way back in to our fashion in the not too distant future, it’s a pipe dream I know but I’m an eternal optimist.

    Joe | April 25, 2012 at 9:06 pm () ()
  3. Ah those were the days, and I remember my mothers wardrobe very well. I spent a lot of my childhood in varaius dress shops with her during school holidays helping her select the right outfits. Her sense of style and glamour she passed onto me, and I try to continue in the same vein. Trousers are useful and have their place. A windy or cold day in the winter months and their practicality is undoubted especially for the working girl, but she can still look all woman.

    However, at the first opportunity, they are put away to the rear ofthe wardrobe and skirts and dresses rule in my mind, and I woudln’t be seen dead in anything other than proper non stretch RHTs at work or FFs for those special nights out. Their practicality, convenience comfort, support and for me the durability of 15d Cervins are unparalled. Couple nylons with a poper 6 strap belt and there is no insecure feeling I get with stretchy modern stockings that seem to want to return to their packet size and haul the belt over your hips.

    In my opinion it is high time women rediscovered their femininity to feel good about themselves. Standards of presentation are sadly lacking and the “whats the point” culture is firmly in hold. Mind you, this applies equally to men these days and precious few gentlemen take pride in their appearance either. There is a time and place for relaxed and comfortable dressing, like gardening and doing the household chores spring to mind. trying to look my best gives me a positive attitude each morning and makes the day so much better.

    Simone

    Simone WIlson | May 24, 2012 at 3:11 pm () ()